- Case Date:
- 8/21/1997
Re: Acct # 8790-56-001-0817559. Subscriber says she received bill which she doesn't owe. Says bill was paid, she moved July 25, TCI office "wouldn't shut off the cable". Sibscriber did not provide copy of bill. See letter attached.
- Case Date:
- 2/5/2004
Phyllis & Samuel Guskin wrote re. 1725 E. Hunter Ave. They want to object to a request to subdivide existing single family residential lot at 1900 Atwater. They feel that the land is unsuitable for development because it appears to be a sinkhole. They also feel that the water retention needs should be addressed before any development is permitted. Letter was received by Util. Dept. but referred to COB Planning Dept.
Other
1969 S Henderson ST
- Case Date:
- 3/30/2001
Mr. Reed stated that he conferred with Mike Bengtson re. costs before he quoted a job. Mr. Bengtson did not quote the sewer connection fee of $1,600.00. Mr. Reed requests that the sewer connection fee of $1,600.00 be returned to him because he was given misinformation.
- Case Date:
- 6/1/1998
Complaint re cable service. See letter.
- Case Date:
- 1/27/1998
General concerns about TCI including programming switches w/out notification, loss of DMX program. Letter is on file.
Other
2311 E Covenanter DR
- Case Date:
- 1/26/2000
Mr. Thomas sent in a letter regarding work that the cable company did in the utility easment behind his home.The cable company cut through a electic line causing damage to appliances in his home that he wishes to be re-payed for the appliances, as well as the bill from Cinergy for the repair of the electic line.The bill will be forwarded to the Construction manager. Mr. Thomas will not have to pay the bill for this, Laura will call on 2-2-00. 2-16-00, Larry Wilkerson handled complaint.
- Case Date:
- 10/21/2002
Ms. Abram of B&L Rentals LLC stated she would like to request a review of cost for application for sewer at 2411 S. Milton Drive. She said she was told by Rebecca Lambert this was not part of neighborhood development and then was informed by Byron Reinhold in early 10/02 this was indeed part of neighborhood development and that hook-on fee was $3,336.73 not including the base fee of $1,280.00. Standard fee of $1,280.00 was paid on 9/6/02.
- Case Date:
- 5/12/1999
See attached letter. Mr. Fritz is having problems with Channels 95, 96, 5 & 6. He talked with Scott Temple. Temple & a repairman came out and the problem seemed to be fixed. But the interference that he is having started back up. The problemed channels are mainly 95 & 96. He has called Insight frequently about this prob. The last time he called the customer service rep. stated that Temple stated that "there was nothing Insight could do, it was a spillover from the antennae off of Sare Road
- Case Date:
- 7/2/1999
Mr. Chin copied the City of Bloomington on a letter to Insight Communications regarding incorrect billing for cancelled service.
- Case Date:
- 8/7/1997
Ms. Anton wrote the Council concerned about flyers being placed on her door. She was worried that if they were placed while she was away burlars would know that no one was home. She wanted to know whether we had or would consider an ordinance prohibiting the use of flyers. Do we have any regulations regarding the use of door hanger notices?