uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (33)

closed #158739

Other

Case Date:
4/12/2017

Possible unauthorized rental/leasing arrangement at 3620 W. Race St., Bloomington, IN 47403. This year I have noticed three short term , out of state, visitors at the described property that appear to be in a room rental agreement with the owner. Typical stay is about one month. Not sure if this an approved activity but worth making sure it's within compliance. We're not overly fond of not knowing who are short term neighbors are. The police have been contacted on two occasions for suspicious activity, possibly related to drugs.

closed #162510

Other

Case Date:
1/24/2018

Norman and code enforcement department, Park Ridge needs your assistance again on this same address please. 3433_E._Third_St._property_needs_owner_attention The house is not being cared for and has become a flophouse for the homeless and drug users. The backdoor is not locking now (I have tried) and inside it's a mess with evidence of trespassers using the house for various activities. BPD has visited the house three times in the past 60 days due to the back door standing open. With the weather and trespassing occurring at the I address, you need to get the owner's attention to lock it up and also care for it in a consistent manner. It has evidence of being abandoned. Also evident are the two waste and recycle toters at the front door - never touched by the homeowner. An advertisement that the house is vacant. Has BPD contacted you for enforcement help? Please help! Steve Akers Park Ridge Neighborhood Association spakers@iu.edu -----Original Message----- From: uReport [mailto:uReport@ureport-prod.bloomington.in.gov] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 4:34 PM To: Akers, Stephen Paul <spakers@indiana.edu> Subject: uReport Case #160136 https://bloomington.in.gov/crm/tickets/view?ticket_id=160136 Closed by Norman Mosier Issued fine, see citation.

open #192312

Other

Case Date:
7/18/2024

Heard Green Acres wants a conservation district. This is an inappropriate use of historic preservation protections. Historic preservation should be to preserve history, not to prevent development as a NIMBY tactic. This area should be able to grow and evolve to meet the density and environmental priorities of the City. There are other areas that have superior and unique historic structures. Don't make a joke of historic preservation. Please include this in public comment in the packet. The City needs a plan for historic preservation of choosing key areas of the City to protect. Blocking general development helps no one. Areas adjacent to campus should maximize student housing for the benefit of all residents.