uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (129860)

open #214981

Other

3440 E Covenanter DR

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Primary Violations: Unpermitted Structural Modifications (Title 17), Severe Structural Moisture Failure & Biological Infestation (Title 16), Willful Falsification of Material Inspection Data, and Deliberate Non-Responsive Regulatory Evasion. 1. Unpermitted and Uninspected Structural Construction & Adoptive Admission (Title 17 Violation) • Incident: Management executed a major structural alteration within the dwelling unit by completely cutting out and replacing the bathroom subfloor structure. • Evidence of Non-Compliance: The tenant was physically present for the entirety of the 90-to-120-minute construction window. This brief timeframe is physically insufficient to allow structural adhesives to cure, waterlogged framing to dry, or mandatory industrial fungicide treatments to be applied to the remaining structural elements underneath. No city building official ever conducted the mandatory rough-in inspection before the structural elements were permanently sealed. • Repeated Failure to Disclose & Adoptive Admission: The tenant has formally demanded the mandatory municipal building permit numbers and city inspection sign-off documentation from management multiple separate times in writing. Management has continuously stonewalled and refused to supply this information, stating formally in writing that they merely "noted" the request and have "no additional information to provide." Because management handles this structural data and refuses to provide it after multiple direct opportunities, their ongoing evasion constitutes a clear adoptive admission that no municipal building permit exists and that the structural work was executed completely outside the law. 2. Physical Evidence of Structural Rot & Gnat Breeding Sources (Title 16 Violation) • Pre-Repair Structural Rot: The tenant retains photographic evidence from when the subfloor was exposed, documenting extensive water damage and advanced dry rot where the structural wood had turned entirely black with a physical hole rusted through the substrate. • The Wall Breach: Due to ongoing structural shifting and unmitigated moisture, a distinct physical gap has opened between the bathroom floor and the wall. • Insect Trapping Data: The tenant placed an electronic light trap inside the bathroom. The trap has captured an extreme infestation with over 100 fungus gnats documented on a single trap inside the room. Management’s contracted pest control professional evaluated the unit, confirmed the apartment was clean, explicitly ruled out drain flies/fruit flies, and stated verbatim: "If it's structural, there's nothing I can do about it," before departing without treating. • Crawlspace Metrics: On Tuesday, October 13, 2026, management’s own inspection captured photographic evidence of an active moisture meter reading of 16.2% "HIGH" with a red visual alarm activated, directly alongside visible puddles and pools of standing water on top of the structural wood in the crawlspace directly beneath this bathroom. 3. Documentation of Management Evasion & Fraudulent Misrepresentation • Blatant Data Falsification: In the exact email thread attaching the photograph of the flashing red 16.2% "HIGH" moisture meter and pools of water, the property manager explicitly typed a fraudulent statement claiming "no other conditions identified." Management is actively misrepresenting their own technical data to evade housing codes and structural remediation. • Biologically Illiterate Deflections: Despite the fact that a 16.2% moisture level is the exact scientific threshold where wood-decay fungi germinate and breed fungus gnats, management continuously demands to apply an over-the-counter drain gel. Fungus gnats do not live inside drains, making this a completely useless, bad-faith cop-out to shift blame away from the structural failure. • Current Posture: On Thursday, October 15, 2026, management scheduled a plumber for October 21st while explicitly refusing to address the permit omissions or moisture data. The tenant has issued a formal notice accepting entry for the pipe leak strictly on the condition that they do not use the visit to alter, seal, or cover the structural evidence before a city inspector can evaluate it. Requested Administrative Actions: 1. Immediate On-Site Inspection: Request that a HAND housing code official conduct an immediate physical inspection of the bathroom subfloor warping, the wall-to-floor separation breach, and the underlying crawlspace puddles. 2. Structural Permit Audit: Initiate a formal municipal audit into the property’s history under Title 17 to verify the total lack of building permits for the subfloor replacement. 3. Stop-Closure Order: Issue a formal directive to management prohibiting their plumbing contractor from sealing, closing up, or covering the bathroom wall or subfloor elements during the October 21st visit, preserving the evidence of wet wood rot and structural shifting for city verification.

open #214980

Sidewalk & Curb Complaints

122 S Walnut St

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Wired box of some kind is open and loose on the sidewalk. Please see to it that this does not present a tripping or electrical hazard.

open #214979

Parking Permits

2204 W Arlington RD

Case Date:
10/15/2026

The college students from Atlas are taking all of the street parking in front of the residential area. They also are becoming a nusiciance as I have had to calm the police three times in one night due to them parking on the side of my house and being extremely loud. The police came and at some point they needed up throwing a bag full of alcohol under my car in hopes not to get caught. I would like for permits to be required to help alleviate these issues.

closed #214978

Blocked Street

3H7H+J4 Smithville-Sanders

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Ally between North park avenue and cottage grove is constantly blocked

closed #214977

Blocked Street

3H7H+J4 Smithville-Sanders

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Ally between North park avenue and cottage grove is constantly blocked

open #214974

Traffic Related Complaints

10th St & John Hinkle Pl

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Hello, I am writing to request a pedestrian safety assessment of the marked crosswalk on East 10th Street, connecting North Woodbridge Drive and East John Hinkle Place in Bloomington. I live on North Woodbridge Drive and regularly use this crosswalk to reach East John Hinkle Place. I have serious concerns about pedestrian safety at this location, particularly given the volume of traffic traveling in both directions at approximately 40 mph. Although the crosswalk is marked, there are no pedestrian-activated warning lights to alert approaching drivers. At these traffic speeds, I believe the existing markings alone provide insufficient warning, creating an unnecessary risk for pedestrians, especially at night. I would like to formally request that the city evaluate installing Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at this crossing. These pedestrian-activated flashing lights would provide motorists with additional warning when someone is attempting to cross East 10th Street. Please let me know whether the city can conduct a safety assessment at this location and what steps would be necessary to consider this improvement. Thank you for your time and consideration.

open #214973

Traffic Related Complaints

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Hello, I am writing to request a pedestrian safety assessment of the marked crosswalk on East 10th Street, connecting North Woodbridge Drive and East John Hinkle Place in Bloomington. I live on North Woodbridge Drive and regularly use this crosswalk to reach East John Hinkle Place. I have serious concerns about pedestrian safety at this location, particularly given the volume of traffic traveling in both directions at approximately 40 mph. Although the crosswalk is marked, there are no pedestrian-activated warning lights to alert approaching drivers. At these traffic speeds, I believe the existing markings alone provide insufficient warning, creating an unnecessary risk for pedestrians, especially at night. I would like to formally request that the city evaluate installing Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at this crossing. These pedestrian-activated flashing lights would provide motorists with additional warning when someone is attempting to cross East 10th Street. Please let me know whether the city can conduct a safety assessment at this location and what steps would be necessary to consider this improvement. Thank you for your time and consideration.

closed #214972

Abandoned Vehicle

4822 N Shelburne DR

Case Date:
10/15/2026

This dark blue Mazda hatchback, license # QQ227 has been sitting in the street unmoved for months. It seems to be abondoned.

open #214970

Blocked Sidewalk

3410 S Walnut ST

Case Date:
10/15/2026

Work is being done in front of the animal shelter to widen the sidewalk. It looks amazing. The trouble is using the detour while this work is going on. It’s very hard/unsafe to cross the street there and is very unsafe to use the road. Tuesday October 13th I was able to use the detour to get to my destination. On my way home I was not, after 5pm. They blocked it while I was at my destination.

closed #214969

Traffic Signals

3802 Industrial Blvd

Case Date:
10/15/2026

The traffic light should have a flashing yellow to turn on hence the sign next to the light. It never flashes yellow any more. Something happened and it only ever turns green then red. It is making late to work please fix this!!!!!!