uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (540)

closed #181410

Other

317 N Dunn ST

Case Date:
9/7/2022

Couch on porch

closed #181412

Other

303 E 10th ST

Case Date:
9/7/2022

Couch on porch

closed #181413

Other

610 N Lincoln ST

Case Date:
9/7/2022

Couch on porch

closed #181436

Other

307 E Cottage Grove AVE

Case Date:
9/8/2022

Couch on porch

closed #181490

Blocked Sidewalk

301 E 7th ST

Case Date:
9/13/2022

Car blocking sidewalk

closed #181645

Other

810 N Lincoln ST

Case Date:
9/27/2022

Over-occupied. Seven names on mailbox. Cars/trucks parked everywhere. Pavilion rental.

closed #181651

Street & Traffic Signs

417 N Grant ST

Case Date:
9/27/2022

It was reported to me that one of the stop signs at Grant and Alice had been damaged. I did not see it. A citizen texted me. >>>>>> text below: Hey, realize this isn't exactly your department, but someone has turned stop and street sign at Grant/Alice intersection 90 degrees

closed #181787

Sidewalk & Curb Complaints

501 N Park AVE

Case Date:
10/11/2022

IU Packer trucks are having a hard time getting access to trash containers along 9th because cars are parking along the curb. The sidewalk was recently re-done but curbs have not been painted. Thanks Jill

closed #181900

Business

113 E Kirkwood AVE

Case Date:
10/25/2022

After reading about the variance denied to the property owner, Randy Lloyd, I couldn’t help but think about the current use of the site at or about 113 E Kirkwood. This property sits in an overlay that does not permit surface parking. I can’t find any use in the UDO where parking is allowed when not attached to a structure, and I specifically remember a number of discussions regarding this issue. In particular the Methodist Church’s desire to convert the footprint of the old post office to surface parking. I believe that had to turn it into green space. I also have concerns that this lot is 100% impervious. 20.4.20 I just don’t see how this use satisfies the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan, the existing UDO, or is consistent w previous use determinations. Further, the owner expanded the parking from what was there pre-demolition of the 4th street garage without any public review. Finally, I doubt this parcel meets the requirements of 18.12.10. How would BFD access or service a car fire on this parcel? It’s too narrow to get truck in there and difficult to service from the alley. This use may have been over looked during the demolition and reconstruction of the 4th street garage, even though parking was not really needed downtown during the pandemic, however, it’s time for enforcement against this parcel and other nonconforming uses.

closed #181932

Sidewalk & Curb Complaints

311 E Cottage Grove AVE

Case Date:
10/28/2022

On the far east end of the brick sidewalk out front, nearly against the retaining wall of 311 E. Cottage Grove and alongside the alley is what remains of what was probably a former street sign pole. It was broken off at some point about 8 inches from the ground. The remaining stump of a steel pole is still there, and it is *VERY* sharp on the tip. It was painted yellow at some point - possibly an attempt to make this hazard visible, but that doesn't help at night. Someone could trip on it, or worse, someone could trip on something else and fall and be impaled on the spike at the top of it. Please remove it ASAP, but whoever removes it needs to understand how to lay bricks because after removal the bricks will need to be relaid and perhaps some will need replacement. Also, no need to replace the sign because there hasn't been one there in a long time and it was ridiculous in the first place to install a sign in a sidewalk where someone could walk right into it in the dark.