uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (11088)

closed #202419

Trash

3351 S Oaklawn CIR

Case Date:
5/1/2025

Trash bag still here today filed u report yesterday assigned to Rob Council. Huge fly in my unit. History of diaper in trash

closed #202422

Trash

3351 S Oaklawn CIR

Case Date:
5/1/2025

Same trash bag as yesterday ripped more. Now with multiple flies

closed #192830

Other

Case Date:
8/12/2024

Opposing making Green Acres a Conservation District: I am writing today as a member of the real estate community here in Bloomington having been an agent for close to a decade. I'm also writing from my experience as a commissioner of both the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals for the past several years. I can very much value and appreciate the history and architectural history of the Green Acres neighborhood. I thank the residents who put in the work and told the story of how Green Acres has evolved from the beginning. Stories like these are worth telling and being displayed to the public as much as possible. As far as the petition itself to deem Green Acres a conservation district leading to full fledged historic district designation, I believe is a very broad overreach of the intentions of historical preservation. Having lived several years in the Near West Side/Prospect Hill neighborhood as well as having owned several properties in historic neighborhoods in other cities I can speak to the impact of this type of designation personally as well. Talking about a select handful of houses, which are notable and can be kept as such, and expanding that to include several hundred that have little to no historic significance is where the overreach comes into play. As a real estate agent and investor myself, I fully understand where many are coming from who oppose this broad reach. The point of historic designation is to single out properties that carry a story all their own, not to lump an entire neighborhood, with a large rental population and no historical significance, and confine the expansion and development that is desperately needed to support a growing University and the city as a whole. I've been a part of many discussions on the commissions which I serve about how we can balance preservation with expansion and development and I've seen cases where that blends very well together and is a win-win. This is not one of those cases but since it has been presented as such I'm strongly opposed to it. I believe the intentions are misguided and really crosses a line into government intrusion into the livelihood of many tax paying owners in that neighborhood who want to continue to house students and families at a time when more housing density, of any kind, is very much needed. There are checks and balances in place already to prevent what many are referencing as the Kmart type development here and I fully support the expansion of this neighborhood. I think the goal here should be to keep the current historically significant houses in Green Acres just as they are and work to preserve other individual properties one at a time. Not taking a very broad stroke and misusing the point of preservation in the first place and thus bottlenecking an area ripe for future development. Thank you for your time.

closed #192312

Other

Case Date:
7/18/2024

Heard Green Acres wants a conservation district. This is an inappropriate use of historic preservation protections. Historic preservation should be to preserve history, not to prevent development as a NIMBY tactic. This area should be able to grow and evolve to meet the density and environmental priorities of the City. There are other areas that have superior and unique historic structures. Don't make a joke of historic preservation. Please include this in public comment in the packet. The City needs a plan for historic preservation of choosing key areas of the City to protect. Blocking general development helps no one. Areas adjacent to campus should maximize student housing for the benefit of all residents.

closed #202499

Trash

401 N Adams ST

Case Date:
5/6/2025

My trash was not collected this morning. (5-6-25) this is the second time it has happened it first happened on 4-22-25. My trash lid is closed and the waste is in bags. The can is always put right at the end of my drive (which ends on the road on Adams St). I just want to know why this is happening and what I can do to keep it from happening in the future. I pay to have the trash collected so I would rather not have to load it in my truck and pay again to have it disposed. Thank you.

closed #202224

Trash

408 S Eagleson AVE

Case Date:
4/23/2025

Trash bags on property for a while. Bags are starting to be torn open and scattered.

closed #202000

Blocked Sidewalk

1125 E Hunter AVE

Case Date:
4/10/2025

ballantine sidewalk has been blocked by a trash can for many days

closed #202485

Sidewalk & Curb Complaints

730 S Woodlawn AVE

Case Date:
5/5/2025

Poisin Ivy is growing on the Woodlawn side. There is also now poison ivy growing across the street at the house on the NE corner of Woodlawn and First. 730 Woodlawn also has honeysuckle plant that is hanging low over the sidewalk. There are generally a lot of weeds in the yard and the sidewalk has a lot of debris on it.

closed #202490

Excessive Growth

1001 E 1st ST

Case Date:
5/5/2025

poison ivy growing out of control

closed #202008

Trash

201 S Jefferson ST

Case Date:
4/10/2025

Construction debris is everywhere around the house and not in a dumpster. Debris is blowing in the street. I cleaned up a bit, but it is dangerous and needs to be in a dumpster.