uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (115564)

closed #76304

Excessive Growth

518 W Howe ST

Case Date:
9/11/1996

Lot EAST OF 518 is not mowed, has dead trees & vegetation in the fence. Mr. Wissing would like a call back.

closed #121072

Water Utility Billing Problems

3350 W Indian Creek DR

Case Date:
9/10/1996

Left payment in Drop box. Check never cleared bank . Her account # 140-07000-00. Customer rec. disconnect notice.

closed #121073

Water Quality

4000 W STATE ROAD 45 RD

Case Date:
9/10/1996

Customer called complaining of dark colored water coming from his faucets. When he turns his faucets on, he gets a lot of sputtering and air coming from the pipes. A new sewer line was installed in front of his house a couple of days ago.

closed #121074

Excessive Growth

1701 S Olive ST

Case Date:
9/10/1996

2 trailers at Olive & Thornton (no address provided). 1 trailer doesn't have underpinning. 5 cars & R.V. at this location also.

closed #121075

Excessive Growth

1018 E THORNTON RD

Case Date:
9/10/1996

2 vehicles parked there for a year with no plates.

closed #121076

Excessive Growth

5891 W STATE ROAD 48

Case Date:
9/10/1996

8 junk cars in yard. This is in the 2 mile fringe. Planning Dept. needs this verified in order to send a letter of violation.

closed #70547

Excessive Growth

424 E 4th ST

Case Date:
9/10/1996

Dumpster overflowing, trash everywhere - behind 424 E. 4th st.

closed #70550

Water Quality

3521 S Burks CT

Case Date:
9/10/1996

Getting sediments from fawcets. Also white film on dishes. Water was sampled 0n June 6, 96. Checked OK. First complaint 6/5/96. T&D flushed area lines 6/5/96.

closed #70551

Water Quality

3521 S Burks CT

Case Date:
9/10/1996

Getting sediments from fawcets. Also white film on dishes. Water was sampled 0n June 6, 96. Checked OK. First complaint 6/5/96. T&D flushed area lines 6/5/96.

closed #121078

Excessive Growth

202 E Ridgeview DR

Case Date:
9/9/1996

Citizen says there is a large tree limb down to the west side of her property. She insists that this is a city easement and city should remove it - says the county always took care of it before. She's 82 on fixed income and can't take care of it. Wants someone to come look at it and determine if it is City's.