uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

closed: Resolved #187733

Street Trees:

Other: Hello. I recently read that many cities (more than in the past) only are planting male trees as less fruit than female trees for cleanup. Something along those lines. Anyways in short the male trees (from what I have read) are wind-blown pollen versus insect-transmitted for female. Short of it, is that all male trees is causing a big increase in suffering among those such as myself with tree pollen allergies. So please do more fruit trees/female trees. Plus fruit/food producing trees are just so much more awesome for a community. Apparently it's called botanical sexism amongst urban planners and it is increasingly recognized as a big problem. We NEED more female trees to remove pollen from the air; I could hardly breathe today. Thank you for considering diversifying the sex of Bloomington trees. I am hopeful we already are focusing on mixed or exclusively female trees and not falling into the trap of botanical sexism of male only.

Assigned to
Haskell Smith

History

3/21/2024 10:25:22 Closed by Haskell Smith

The vast majority of trees we plant are cosexual or monoecious, meaning they have both male and female flower structures. Currently, Elm is probably the biggest offender for wind pollination, but again it is monoecious.

Sent notification to Haskell Smith
https://bloomington.in.gov/crm/tickets/view?ticket_id=187733 Closed by Haskell Smith The vast majority of trees we plant are cosexual or monoecious, meaning they have both male and female flower structures. Currently, Elm is probably the biggest offender for wind pollination, but again it is monoecious.

3/20/2024 22:19:29 Anonymous assigned this case to Haskell Smith

Sent notification to Haskell Smith
https://bloomington.in.gov/crm/tickets/view?ticket_id=187733 Anonymous assigned this case to Haskell Smith You can use the link to follow progress on this case.

3/20/2024 22:19:29 Opened by Anonymous