Water Utility Billing Problems
3920 N Whitewood WAY
- Case Date:
- 8/14/2003
Customer states he received large bill for service from 7/1-7/31 and was very upset - has not had such a large bill before. States he was told by Cust. Rel. Dept. that he no longer gets summer sewer averaging. Feels he should have lower bill.
Water Utility Billing Problems
900 E 14th ST
- Case Date:
- 8/4/2003
Water Utility Billing Problems
900 E 14th ST
- Case Date:
- 8/4/2003
Water Utility Billing Problems
900 E 14th ST
- Case Date:
- 8/4/2003
Ms. Rockwood wrote re. 2 properties - 401 S. Dunn and 900 E. 14th. She does not believe she owes amounts for former tenants because she no longer owns property at 401 S. Dunn and she did not receive bills in a timely fashion. She states she is sending check for $466.02 for payment-in-full.
Water Utility Billing Problems
3412 N Windcrest DR
- Case Date:
- 7/24/2003
Sara Feuerbach, owner of 3411 Windcrest, does not feel she should be responsible for unpaid bill of former tenant (Victoria Johnson) because she was not timely notified of delinquency. Ms. Feuerbach requests review by the USB Administrative Subcommittee.
Water Utility Billing Problems
210 N Smith RD
- Case Date:
- 7/22/2003
Owner, Robert Crider, wants to protest his being held responsible for large unpaid bill for tenant Amanda Choi. He states he did not receive notification of delinquent bill.
Water Utility Billing Problems
4154 E Hector DR
- Case Date:
- 7/21/2003
Customer is very upset about the fact of having to pay a higher rate for their irrigation water vs their house water. Also, they were surprised about the $18 fee to have the meter s/o in the fall because we used to not charge a "disconnect" fee only a "reconnect" fee in the Spring. I explained to her the policy had changed, and to avoid paying the service fees over the Winter she would have the $18 s/o in the Fall and the $18 turn on in the Spring. I let her know each trip was a svc call.
Water Utility Billing Problems
415 N Roosevelt ST
- Case Date:
- 7/21/2003
Customer feels he was "ripped off" because we charged him an $18 service fee to shut off his meter when he ended his service. He feels after being a customer and paying for our services for some time that we should not charge them to stop their service.
Water Utility Billing Problems
1355 N Lincoln ST
- Case Date:
- 6/26/2003
Olympus prop. received large bill ($394.52) for former tenant (C. Stone Chadwick) at 1355 N. Lincoln. They do not feel they should be held responsible for former tenant's bill when they were not notified of delinquent account.
Water Utility Billing Problems
3341 N Kinser PIKE
- Case Date:
- 6/17/2003
Ms. Warren requested an adjustment on account for property she owns at 3341 N. Kinser Pike. Her tenant left owing 7 months utilities bills. She does not feel she should be held responsible for her tenant's unpaid bills.