uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (4686)

closed #165422

Yard Waste

411 E Saville AVE

Case Date:
8/7/2018

exceeds size limits of 35 gallons

closed #165397

Yard Waste

2124 E Woodstock PL

Case Date:
8/7/2018

exceed weight limit of 40 lbs

closed #165390

Yard Waste

722 W 4th ST

Case Date:
8/7/2018

exceeds weight limit of 40 lbs

closed #165389

Yard Waste

620 W 13th ST

Case Date:
8/7/2018

exceeds weight limit of 40lbs

closed #165373

Yard Waste

811 S Larkspur LN

Case Date:
8/4/2018

They've had a pile of decomposing yard waste on the curb for over a month

closed #165163

Yard Waste

916 S Larkspur LN

Case Date:
7/16/2018

Pile of yard waste in driveway for 2 weeks now

closed #165108

Yard Waste

Case Date:
7/10/2018

We live at 806 W. 4th St., in Bloomington. Today, Tuesday, July 10 was our normal trash pick-up day, and also the day for yard waste pickup, according to Bloomington Sanitation's "yard waste collection schedule." We have two 35 gallon bins filled with yard waste waiting at the curb in front of our house. They are properly packaged, and under the 40 pound limit. While our garbage and recycle bins were collected, these yard waste bins were ignored, (although they have been collected on past dates) No note was left by the Sanitation Dept. workers. We appreciate this service, and don't mind the collection fee, but we were missed today.

closed #165089

Yard Waste

1364 East Rogers Road

Case Date:
7/10/2018

Duke Energy removed two trees from city property (immediately adjacent to E Rogers Road) and left the two sycamore trucks cut up in 8' segments on my property. I called Duke and asked them to remove them, but they said it's the landowner's responsibility (Duke cuts, but doesn't remove). Since the trees were on city-owned land, I hope the city will dispose of them. Please see the attached screenshot from the GIS system that demonstrates where my property boundary ends. The city clearly owns some portion of land adjacent to the road. These two trees were within three feet of Rogers Road, and were removed to provide more access to the pole Duke is replacing. Additionally, I'm frustrated with Duke about two things: 1) The pipe they've installed immediately adjacent to the road is incredibly unsightly. It's rusty and approximately 20 feet too long. I'd be happy to provide a picture of this. 2) In order to get big trucks back to this pole, they have installed two corrugated plastic drainage pipes and covered them with gravel. They are dramatically too small for the location. Since they first did this several years ago, the pipes are continuously clogged with leaves and sticks. The flow of water is constantly stopped here. As a result, there is a bit of local flooding which washes out the gravel Duke uses to cover the culverts. This is a very disappointing solution to have implemented on one's property. I have pictures of this, as well. I have no problem with Duke accessing their pole. They have every right to do so. I also understand that the City probably didn't know their trees were cut down or placed on my property. But I'm quite disappointed in the quality of materials and work that Duke has utilized to access their easement on my property. Can you please help with these things?

closed #164982

Yard Waste

505 E Allen ST

Case Date:
6/27/2018

The city blocked some section of the road off (presumably to slow traffic). Now there is just yard waste and old hay bails left in them. It looks trashy.

closed #164818

Yard Waste

2640 S Isabel CT

Case Date:
6/14/2018

exceeds wight limit of 40 lbs