uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (1656)

closed #101559

Other

2925 S Olcott BLVD

Case Date:
3/22/2004

Mr. Brown contacted the Public Works office on 3/22/04 to express his concern to the Telecommunications Council regarding his cable bill going from $41.45 to 44.75 with out an explanation. Mr. Brown stated that if Insight had competition then an increase would not be issued with out an explanation.

closed #101651

Other

1409 S Madison ST

Case Date:
2/20/2004

At least 6-10 semi-trucks and other large trucks driving on South Madison Street and turning on Hillside to deliver to area business; possibly "American Fasteners". Ms Selk feels that semi-trucks are not allowed in RS neighborhoods. She would like a follow-up phone call.

closed #101659

Other

2605 E 3rd ST

Case Date:
2/18/2004

STATES RENTAL PROPERTY AT 2603 E 3RD IS VACANT AND TENANTS AT 2605 E 3RD ARE DRIVING ACROSS 2603 LAWN TO GET TO STREET.

closed #101685

Other

735 S College AVE

Case Date:
2/13/2004

STATES THERE IS A TANK WHICH HOLDS USED MOTOR OIL AND IS LEAKING. THERE ARE ALSO USED OIL FILTERS IN CREEK BEHIND PROPERTY.

closed #101690

Other

2836 S Walnut Street PIKE

Case Date:
2/13/2004

is there a composting program in bloomington? reply- gave information on bloomington's composting program

closed #101716

Other

7900 XERXES S 1500

Case Date:
2/10/2004

question about permit for charity raffle at golf event reply- no permit necessary

closed #101733

Other

401 N Morton ST

Case Date:
2/5/2004

student looking for Bloomington voting results reply- attached copy of CNN webpage, call voter registration office

closed #101734

Other

401 N Morton ST

Case Date:
2/5/2004

inquiry about affirmitive action plan for companies doing business withe the city reply- forwarded to human rights dept. gave ph.#

closed #38054

Other

1725 E Hunter AVE

Case Date:
2/5/2004

Phyllis & Samuel Guskin wrote re. 1725 E. Hunter Ave. They want to object to a request to subdivide existing single family residential lot at 1900 Atwater. They feel that the land is unsuitable for development because it appears to be a sinkhole. They also feel that the water retention needs should be addressed before any development is permitted. Letter was received by Util. Dept. but referred to COB Planning Dept.

closed #38062

Other

226 S College AVE

Case Date:
2/5/2004

question about section 16.20.040 of municipal code and process of proposed ordinance. reply-anwsered question and referred to Dan Sherman