Case Date:

1/13/1995

Case Date:

3/22/1999

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER AND PHOTOGRAPHS.

Case Date:

4/19/2024

To whom it may concern, The following describes multiple code violations from Chandler Automotive that I noticed/experienced during the process of retrieving my towed car from their site. I have video/audio evidence of the violations, and I would prefer if someone reached out to me so I can submit these as proof. It will only allow me to upload images through this submission form. Thank you: BMC 4.32.140(b): Called the number at around 5:30pm to ask to retrieve car, employee stated that she will not be able to get my car until about 9:30/10pm. This is in violation of part 1 of section B, as well as violation of part 2 of section B, since this was well outside the sixty minutes. I recorded the phone call where the employee told me 10pm. Please reach out if you would like this evidence. BMC 4.32.140(f): The invoice, see attached, is not itemized correctly pursuant to the requirements of I.C. 24-14-5-1. The invoice is missing/incorrectly accounted for the following: - I.C. 24-14-5-1(4)(D) - No VIN number. - I.C. 24-14-5-1(4)(C) - No year. - I.C. 24-14-5-1(5) - License plate # is incorrect. - I.C. 24-14-5-1(C) - No explanation is given for the additional charges incurred, which is required here. BMC 4.32.130(a)(2) - The company attempted to charge me $185 for the tow. One $25 charge being a go jack fee, and the other being a dollies fee. Since a go jack fee is a special fee, the total for those should not be $50 according to the code, but a maximum of $25. They corrected this upon me providing them a copy of the code. However, I have audio recording of them attempting to charge me that amount, and being unable to explain these additional charges. BMC 4.32.120(a) - As stated above, the towing company failed to comply with applicable state law in the invoice. BMC 4.32.120(e) - The vehicle was not able to be claimed upon calling at 5:30pm on 4/18/2024. Please reach out for a copy of the evidence as I am not able to upload it here. These laws were created by the legislature with the intention to be construed strictly due to the stated purpose of this chapter being to protect the public from unconscionable practices (BMC 4.32.010). Please reach out to me if you have any additional questions. I plan on following up in fourteen (14) days if I have not heard back from the city on this matter by that time. Thank you for taking the time to read this complaint, and I appreciate your enforcement of the laws of our wonderful city. Respectfully, Matt Shelton

Case Date:

5/15/2021

Busted/broken utility pole on corner of Madison and 15th.

Case Date:

8/30/2022

Bamboo in the backyard and easement

Case Date:

5/13/2021

dead cat at the end of my driveway on the sidewalk

Case Date:

10/17/1996

KOONTZ IS CONCERNED WITH THE EAST/WEST ALLEY TO THE SOUTH OF HER PROPERTY. TRUCKS ARE USING THIS ALLEY AS CUT THROUGH AND SOMETIMES PARK IN THE ALLEY FOR PERIODS OF TIME. KOONTZ WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A "NO TRUCK" SIGN INSTALLED FOR THE ALLEY DUE TO THE ALLEY NOT BEING WIDE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE THE TRUCKS. NOTE: KOONTZ STATED THAT REYNOLDS GROUP DAMAGED HER FENCE WHILE DOING WORK FOR THE CITY UTILITIES DEPT ON ROGERS STREET.

Case Date:

4/29/1999

Ms. Cherrington has problem with $1500 occupancy fine. In addition, she feels that the City provides no way to appeal such fines. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER FOR MORE DETAILS.

Case Date:

8/3/1998

Possible abandoned vehicle in driveway.

Case Date:

6/29/2015

I found a street sign under a tree in my yard while mowing yesterday. pPlease come by and pick it up. It will be just next to the fire hydrant. Thank you.