closed #182107
Business
411 E Southern DR APT 10
- Case Date:
- 11/18/2022
Bed bugs reported in location as building-wide issue. APT owners not treating.
Bed bugs reported in location as building-wide issue. APT owners not treating.
Pavillion Properties owns the empty parking lot to the north of us. It always collects trash, needles, etc. No one cleans it up and its reflecting on our business (Vanished Aesthetics and Contouring) next door. Is there anything that can be done about this?
Neighbor (pavillion properties) leaves the gravel pit unattended and the trash is overflowing, there is waste and needles all over the lot. There is now a mattress where homeless are sleeping. It is creating risk for clients and staff. He should be penalized for not maintaining the property.
Community violations of the following Title 16 - RESIDENTIAL RENTAL UNIT AND LODGING ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTION PROGRAM[1]: 16.04.060 - Interior structure. 16.04.080 - Rubbish and garbage. 16.04.090 - Extermination/pest control. 16.05.010 - Compliance with local and state laws.
Heritage apartments 1610 Hillside Dr has a full pool of stagnant water. It has been this way for one month.
Several weeks ago on 8th Street in Hopewell The house in the corner had some kind of construction where the city road was tore up they have since left some of it was fixed but they're still an uneven spot on the road can we get this addressed and fixed?
What is the proper protocol for trash illegally dumped at the road? I got a citation as property owner that I have to clean up, stuff that was dumped in the street, according to the inspector most is in our yard so we have to clean it up. Which is a lie most is in your street and a little is in the tree plot. I don’t think I should be responsible to clean up what someone illegally dumped in your streets.
Overoccupancy rental 119 S Bryan rented to at least 6.
Zillow says they can have 7 people? Is that true? What a mess for a neighborhood - for 119 s bryan
Would someone please take a second look at the uReport ticket 182548. This was closed with a comment indicating outside of city limits, which I believe is erroneous. According to the interactive city map, these addresses are in council district 5.