Street Snow Removal
407 S Grant ST
- Case Date:
- 1/29/2004
Bill Hayden took pictures of Commerical Properties that cleared their parking lots and dumped the snow on the sidewalk. He requests that the compliance office contact him about this issue and what can be done to notify the owners and get the snow off of the sidewalk.
Street Snow Removal
2713 E Rock Creek CT
- Case Date:
- 2/1/2019
I had filed a claim earlier asking Bloomington to stop pushing snow on my retaining wall and that you had only plowed half of my drive. A driver came back and plowed and broke our wall. I have tried to email because the closed the claim saying resolved, but as you can see now that the snow has melted a little this situation is clearly not resolved. We paid $4000.00 for this retaining wall. I have called, emailed, my husband has come to your office and this is now my second claim. Please help!!
Street Snow Removal
2104 S Azalea LN
- Case Date:
- 2/5/2022
I just saw the USPS truck pass up a few houses on our block, probably because about 5-6 feet of street in front of the mailboxes are unplowed. After not getting mail for two days, it's pretty unlikely neither we or our neighbor (who shares the mailbox post with us) have mail. Will the city plow more of the street so our mailboxes are accessible, or are we responsible for shoveling that 5-6 feet of city street ourselves?
Street Trees
2481 W Schmalz BLVD
- Case Date:
- 6/25/2024
There is a tree down on Tapp Road (post-storm on the afternoon of 6/25/2024) blocking two lanes of west-bound traffic. This is at the corner of Tapp Road and Vanguard (where it crosses between World Wide Automotive Service and the medical offices for Hospice House, Summit Urology, etc.).
Temporary Signage w/o permit
3900 E 3rd ST
- Case Date:
- 6/10/2008
The OFfice Lounge has pennants on building hanging over parking lot
Traffic Related Complaints
803 S High ST
- Case Date:
- 5/17/1996
ACTION ORDER FROM MAYOR'S OFFICE (ATTACHED). HIGH STREET/MAXWELL LANE NEEDS SOME TYPE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL TO MAKE IT SAFER (ATTACHED LETTER FROM MS. JOHNSON). JANE FLEIG TOOK A LOOK AT SITE ON 5/24/96.
Traffic Related Complaints
803 S High ST
- Case Date:
- 5/17/1996
ACTION ORDER FROM MAYOR'S OFFICE (ATTACHED). HIGH STREET/MAXWELL LANE NEEDS SOME TYPE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL TO MAKE IT SAFER (ATTACHED LETTER FROM MS. JOHNSON). JANE FLEIG TOOK A LOOK AT SITE ON 5/24/96.
Traffic Related Complaints
1116 S College Mall RD
- Case Date:
- 10/16/2003
Carnes was upset by the median placed in front of Dr. Steele's Office. She almost hit it on Oct. 14, 2003.
Traffic Related Complaints
2942 S Walnut ST
- Case Date:
- 8/18/2015
Hello, I am re-developing the property @ 3000 South Walnut. The location is where the former Southern Winds Hotel and Roosters club were located. The property at the beginning a workout facility and a chiropractors office. AS you pull out from the property and are going to turn left (North) and cross traffic, there are two trees located to the north on the side of the road. When cars are coming South and I am turning to the North, it is difficult to see whats coming and that is where the speed limit changes from 30 to 40mph, which is the place many seems to start speeding up. We will have more traffic than ever entering and leaving the property right from the beginning and even more as the property continues to be redeveloped overtime after the initial building and business's are active. A stop light right around there of course would be superb for the property but probably could never happen due to the traffic that occur that comes over the hill when people are traveling South down South Walnut. With that in mind I was hoping the two large trees could be taken down so it is much safer at that point because of the visibility that would open up. One tree is directly in from of the property and the other is directly in front on an older apartment complex that has around 10 apartments in it, it looks like. Would this be possible? Or maybe we could plant a couple new tress which would be much smaller and take several years to grow out? Of course that problem would show up again several years from now but it would take care of it presently for sevevral years. I am just worried about such a great new area being redeveloped for the area and future to have potential traffic issues with people being able to see when pulling out of the property. Thanks a lot, Tommy.
Traffic Suggestions
216 E Burks DR
- Case Date:
- 10/8/2018
The construction on Rhorer and Gordon Pike has pushed a lot of the thru-traffic on the South side to East Burks Dr., resulting in a traffic load that the small, curved road wasn't designed for. More cars are coming through, and not always at a safe speed.
This issue is highlighted by the fact that currently, there are no signs prohibiting parking on either side of Burks Dr., so residents park on both sides of the street. This creates a one-lane road that has to accommodate a large traffic load (relative to it's design). Some residents have even taken to parking large tractor/trailer vehicles on the road, which almost completely eliminates visibility of oncoming traffic as you round the bend going from west-to-east.
My suggestion is to please restrict parking to the east-to-west side of the street, and post "No Parking" signs on the west-to-east side of the street. This allows for the greatest visibility for both sides of traffic, and also maintains two-way traffic, an important element to South side transportation with alternate routes still under construction.