uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (114766)

closed #88409

Recycling

113 LINCOLN

Case Date:
1/15/2008

1/14/08 Recyclable items not properly sorted. Must be sorted for pick-up 945 las

closed #91340

Trash

113 JEFFERSON

Case Date:
6/4/2007

can exceeds size limit

closed #101178

Recycling

113 E Southern DR

Case Date:
5/7/2004

Missed pick-up/recycling: faxed ljl

closed #102123

Trash

113 E Southern DR

Case Date:
11/3/2003

2nd notice faxedMissed pick-up/trash: Missed her trash on Fri. put it back out last night for today's pick up still not picked up notice faxed on Fri.

closed #38854

Trash

113 E Southern DR

Case Date:
10/31/2003

Jason/ For Monday pickup/ Missed pick-up/trash: faxed ddh/ Forgot to pick her trash up last Fri. & this Fri. She took it back in before going to work will place it back out for Monday pick up.

closed #6890

Yard Waste

113 E Southern DR

Case Date:
4/26/2010

improper container

closed #153344

Yard Waste

113 E Southern DR

Case Date:
6/7/2016

overweight 40lb weight limit

closed #143903

Sewer Problems (Sanitary Sewers)

113 E Southern DR

Case Date:
3/5/2015

Toilet is overflowing, and sewage is coming out of the shower drain.

closed #181900

Business

113 E Kirkwood AVE

Case Date:
10/25/2022

After reading about the variance denied to the property owner, Randy Lloyd, I couldn’t help but think about the current use of the site at or about 113 E Kirkwood. This property sits in an overlay that does not permit surface parking. I can’t find any use in the UDO where parking is allowed when not attached to a structure, and I specifically remember a number of discussions regarding this issue. In particular the Methodist Church’s desire to convert the footprint of the old post office to surface parking. I believe that had to turn it into green space. I also have concerns that this lot is 100% impervious. 20.4.20 I just don’t see how this use satisfies the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan, the existing UDO, or is consistent w previous use determinations. Further, the owner expanded the parking from what was there pre-demolition of the 4th street garage without any public review. Finally, I doubt this parcel meets the requirements of 18.12.10. How would BFD access or service a car fire on this parcel? It’s too narrow to get truck in there and difficult to service from the alley. This use may have been over looked during the demolition and reconstruction of the 4th street garage, even though parking was not really needed downtown during the pandemic, however, it’s time for enforcement against this parcel and other nonconforming uses.

closed #188493

Street Lights

113 E Kirkwood AVE

Case Date:
5/16/2024

Street lights on the south side of Kirkwood from Washington to Grant are not on