Case Date:

12/9/2002

Customer unhappy with having to pay service charges over winter while in Florida

Case Date:

11/26/2002

Cust is unhappy with having to pay the service charges for her irrigation meter over the winter months while not in use. Also, expressed that increase in irrigation water charges is excessive.

Case Date:

9/17/2002

Mr. LaGrange sent letter explaining that IMI did not receive ww charge until 5/02 in the amount of $2,272.77. They paid this amount but have now received other ww bills and are asking for adjustment.

Case Date:

8/14/2002

Customer called asking why he is being billed fire protection on his irrigation meter. I explained to him it was a charge that has always been there it is now broken down separately. He says he pays it on his domestic meter and shouldn't have to pay it on his irrigation meter. I told him I would forward on his comments. He did want some else to call him back.

Case Date:

6/12/2002

Mrs. Hughes called on 6/12/02 to talk about her bill. She said she was not credited for last payment and recd. bill for 4000 gallons for 1 week. I referred her to Margaret Dalle-Ave. Mrs. Hughes requested # for IURC which I gave to her.

Case Date:

5/23/2002

Mr. Yost stated that he requested that water be turned off in October 2001; however, he received and paid bills for next five months. He is requesting that he be refunded the amount of these payments ($59.20).

Case Date:

4/17/2002

Ms. Sylvester called and stated that she and her neighbors wanted to state their feelings about the format of the new CBU bills. She does not think the bill is easier to read; in fact, it is much more confusing.

Case Date:

2/19/2002

Customer called to suggest that a phone number be printed on the bill so customers don't have to look number up in the phone book....

Case Date:

2/18/2002

Customer concerned about two things on new billing format. When they are an aqua-pay customer it says balance due $0.00 but under that says the amount being debited from their account. Customer says it is confusing. Also said a phone number to call should be on the bill.

Case Date:

7/30/2001

Mr. Waters has called and visited numerous times. He feels he should be credited $50 because he was on vacation and did not use that amount of water. His meter was tested and no problems were found. Mr. Waters told that he could not be credited that amount. He wants to appeal to Mike Phillips when he returns.