uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (53)

closed #64768

Water Utility Billing Problems

4420 E Etter DR

Case Date:
3/20/1998

Mr. Brinson presented CBU with a copy of his plat from October 1957 stating his address should be 4420 Etter Dr.; however, U.S.P.S. records show this address should be 4420 E. Etter Road.

closed #58953

Water Utility Billing Problems

441 W Gourley PIKE

Case Date:
2/23/1999

Letter was received from Mr. Hartung re. ofc. bldg. he owns at 441 Gourley Pike. He received bill for $733.69 and wants it checked for errors.

closed #46230

Water Utility Billing Problems

4333 E Stephens DR

Case Date:
2/19/2002

Customer doesn't like that on her new bill it says $0.00 balance due but at the bottom says the amount being taken out of her bank account. She has aqua-pay. She says this is confusing. Also says phone number should be on the bill someplace.

closed #70156

Water Utility Billing Problems

425 N Walnut ST

Case Date:
11/25/1996

Jeff Delaplane owns the building at 425 N. Walnut St. He complained that he is actually not hooked on to sewer but has been paying sewer charges. He would like to be reimbursed the paid sewer charges and excavation charges.

closed #118721

Water Utility Billing Problems

421 E 19th ST

Case Date:
9/9/1997

MS. BARKLEY WROTE ON 9/5/97 AND REQUESTED A REFUND FOR WHAT SHE FEELS ARE OVERCHARGES FOR HER APARTMENT BUILDINGS.

closed #40259

Water Utility Billing Problems

4154 E Hector DR

Case Date:
7/21/2003

Customer is very upset about the fact of having to pay a higher rate for their irrigation water vs their house water. Also, they were surprised about the $18 fee to have the meter s/o in the fall because we used to not charge a "disconnect" fee only a "reconnect" fee in the Spring. I explained to her the policy had changed, and to avoid paying the service fees over the Winter she would have the $18 s/o in the Fall and the $18 turn on in the Spring. I let her know each trip was a svc call.

closed #40269

Water Utility Billing Problems

415 N Roosevelt ST

Case Date:
7/21/2003

Customer feels he was "ripped off" because we charged him an $18 service fee to shut off his meter when he ended his service. He feels after being a customer and paying for our services for some time that we should not charge them to stop their service.

closed #41240

Water Utility Billing Problems

400 1/2 W 11th ST

Case Date:
4/14/2003

Mr. Wright feels that a large bill he received was fault of his water meter. Meter was checked & found to be working properly. Mr. Wright wants to take this matter to USB for review.

closed #39903

Water Utility Billing Problems

3920 N Whitewood WAY

Case Date:
8/14/2003

Customer states he received large bill for service from 7/1-7/31 and was very upset - has not had such a large bill before. States he was told by Cust. Rel. Dept. that he no longer gets summer sewer averaging. Feels he should have lower bill.

closed #61377

Water Utility Billing Problems

3830 E Tamarron DR

Case Date:
9/29/1998

Ms. Gregory talked to Kathy Grubb-Britton and indicated that her bill was in an excessive amount.