Water Utility Billing Problems
4420 E Etter DR
- Case Date:
- 3/20/1998
Mr. Brinson presented CBU with a copy of his plat from October 1957 stating his address should be 4420 Etter Dr.; however, U.S.P.S. records show this address should be 4420 E. Etter Road.
Water Utility Billing Problems
441 W Gourley PIKE
- Case Date:
- 2/23/1999
Letter was received from Mr. Hartung re. ofc. bldg. he owns at 441 Gourley Pike. He received bill for $733.69 and wants it checked for errors.
Water Utility Billing Problems
437 N Hillsdale DR
- Case Date:
- 2/15/2018
eSuite utilities site is throwing an error when logging in to the site with bill information
Water Utility Billing Problems
4333 E Stephens DR
- Case Date:
- 2/19/2002
Customer doesn't like that on her new bill it says $0.00 balance due but at the bottom says the amount being taken out of her bank account. She has aqua-pay. She says this is confusing. Also says phone number should be on the bill someplace.
Water Utility Billing Problems
425 N Walnut ST
- Case Date:
- 11/25/1996
Jeff Delaplane owns the building at 425 N. Walnut St. He complained that he is actually not hooked on to sewer but has been paying sewer charges. He would like to be reimbursed the paid sewer charges and excavation charges.
Water Utility Billing Problems
4210 E Deckard DR
- Case Date:
- 9/18/2019
I have moved and need my address updated to 401 S Notre Dame AVE, South Bend IN 46617. This is for account #504-003 and my name is Lori Hiscock
Water Utility Billing Problems
421 E 19th ST
- Case Date:
- 9/9/1997
MS. BARKLEY WROTE ON 9/5/97 AND REQUESTED A REFUND FOR WHAT SHE FEELS ARE OVERCHARGES FOR HER APARTMENT BUILDINGS.
Water Utility Billing Problems
416 E 12th ST
- Case Date:
- 9/6/2022
We were overcharged for water this month. The SA Customer Portal Dashboard says we consumed 1,774 gallons of water from August 2-September 1, and the bill claims we consumed 3,000 gallons.
Water Utility Billing Problems
4154 E Hector DR
- Case Date:
- 7/21/2003
Customer is very upset about the fact of having to pay a higher rate for their irrigation water vs their house water. Also, they were surprised about the $18 fee to have the meter s/o in the fall because we used to not charge a "disconnect" fee only a "reconnect" fee in the Spring. I explained to her the policy had changed, and to avoid paying the service fees over the Winter she would have the $18 s/o in the Fall and the $18 turn on in the Spring. I let her know each trip was a svc call.
Water Utility Billing Problems
415 N Roosevelt ST
- Case Date:
- 7/21/2003
Customer feels he was "ripped off" because we charged him an $18 service fee to shut off his meter when he ended his service. He feels after being a customer and paying for our services for some time that we should not charge them to stop their service.