uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (1024)

closed #137413

Other

2012 S Montclair AVE

Case Date:
4/21/2014

property appears abandoned and derelict, believes it should be declared unsafe and sealed

closed #114652

Other

2010 W Ross LN

Case Date:
3/30/1999

WOULD LIKE YARD REPAIRED WHERE CBU WORKED IN DECEMBER

closed #169971

Other

201 E Southern DR

Case Date:
8/20/2019

Manhole cover not secured

closed #121351

Other

201 E Burks DR

Case Date:
5/10/1996

JAN GOLIGHTLY'S MOTHER OWNS THE PROPERTIES AT 201 & 203 BURKS COURT. SHE HAS FLOODING IN HER CRAWLSPACE (OVER 20" OF WATER). SHE WOULD LIKE TO GET SOME HELP FROM THE CITY IF POSSIBLE. SEE ATTACHED MEMO FROM DENISE, PERMIT CLERK.

closed #188295

Other

2008 E Greenbriar LN

Case Date:
5/7/2024

I am a neighbor of this address. Twice in the past year, the two dogs who live at this property have been in the street and charged me and my dog. On another occasion, one of the dogs charged the property's fence and attempted to bite me by reaching *over* the fence. I have reported two of these instances to Animal Control. The last time (when the dog attempt to bite over the fence), the Animal Control officer told me that he had explained to the owners that their fence violates zoning by being too close to the sidewalk, and that the owners had expressed an intention to remove the fence in the front and keep the dogs in the back. However, I have heard, "We keep the dogs in the back" multiple times, when that is not true. The Animal Control Officer suggested that I could contact the city's zoning office, to have the fencing issue in the front yard addressed. I cannot find a way to contact Zoning specifically, so I am submitting the request here. FWIW, other people have had encounters with these dogs, though I don't know if they have reported it. Thank you.

closed #188351

Other

2008 E Greenbriar LN

Case Date:
5/9/2024

Following up regarding the closing of ticket 1882595. The Animal Control Officer indicated that the fence was, by Zoning standards, too close to the sidewalk. (I.e., not that it wasn't tall enough.)

closed #64947

Other

2007 E 2nd ST

Case Date:
2/25/1998

THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF 2007 E 2ND STREET IS FLUSH WITH THE ROADWAY. THE SIDEWALK IS NOT RAISED IN THIS AREA. IT IS VERY DANGEROUS.

closed #121341

Other

2005 S Rogers ST

Case Date:
5/15/1996

ROAD CONSTRUCTION-UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SOUTH ROGERS STREET FROM THE RAILROAD TRACKS TO ROCKPORT ROAD. THERE ARE SEVERAL POTHOLES IN THE ROAD AND THERE IS A DANGEROUS DRIVING SITUATION BECAUSE DRIVERS ARE DRIVING IN THE NORTHBOUND LANE GOING SOUTH TO AVOID THE POTHOLES. WHY CAN THEY NOT PUT A TEMPORARY PATCH ON ROAD SINCE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN WORKING IN THIS AREA FOR THE PAST TWO TO THREE WEEKS. I RECEIVED SEVERAL COMMENTS FROM PEOPLE IN AREA REGARDING THIS PROJECT. WHAT IS THE TIME SCHEDULE

closed #137352

Other

2003 S High ST

Case Date:
4/16/2014

closed #168885

Other

2003 S High ST

Case Date:
6/11/2019

We're moving to B'ton in July on S. High St. Our moving van will need to block S. High for 4-5 hours on a weekday; do we need a permit to have the truck block a bus route, and what is the cost if yes?