Case Date:

7/27/2026

The website “gobloomington.org” is either an unofficial site posing as an official city initiative, or it needs fixing. It features the city logo and copyright on the bottom of the page, but none of the links work except for the “register / login” option at the bottom of the page which leads to a gambling website (making it seem like perhaps someone else is using the city’s logo and name as a front for that site?). If this is indeed an official city website, it should not be leading to a scammy gambling site. If it is not an official city website, I hope you are able to file a cease and desist to get the misleading site removed from the web. Thank you.

Case Date:

7/24/2026

Follow up to report # 211915 Thank you for reviewing my report. I appreciate the time Planning and BPD took to look into my concerns. I understand BPD's explanation that noise from vehicles operating at a business is not something they can cite as an ordinance violation. However, I don't believe that fully addressed the questions raised in my original report. I understand the property dates back to 1980 and that there may not be an approved site plan on file. However, if the intensity or nature of the business's operations has changed significantly since that time—particularly with increased semi-truck traffic, early morning unloading activities, or the regular use of residential neighborhood entrances—I was wondering whether those changes would require any additional review, approvals, or compliance with current zoning or development standards. I also noticed my question regarding truck circulation was not addressed. Specifically, are semi-trucks permitted to routinely access the property through the Broadview neighborhood entrances, or are they expected to use the primary entrance on Country Club Drive? If there is no site plan, is there another document or approval that governs truck access and circulation for the property? I recognize that businesses have a right to operate and that some level of noise is expected. My concern is not with the existence of the business itself, but whether its current operations and traffic patterns remain consistent with applicable City regulations and whether there are reasonable ways to reduce the impact on the surrounding residential neighborhood. I would appreciate any clarification you can provide regarding these questions. Thank you again for your time.

Case Date:

7/8/2026

UPDATE 7/8/2026 — Vehicle recovered. New information for investigation: Tow company: Tow Time Solutions LLC, 1999 N Packing House Rd (Invoice #2305, Call #29202). 1. AUTHORIZATION (BMC 4.32.100(a)): Invoice shows tow requested 7/7/26 at 7:20 PM, completed 8:08 PM — after the management office closed. The invoice's "Authorized by" field reads "(PAV) Lincoln, 305," which is the property address, not a person. Granite's assistant leasing manager stated in writing that towing companies cannot access their parking portal and tow on their own initiative whenever no hanging tag is displayed — i.e., patrol towing with no per-tow written authorization. My 7/8 written request for a copy of the signed authorization is unanswered. My vehicle had been registered in Granite's parking system since 6/22/26 with parking paid. 2. FEES (BMC 4.32.130): Charged $150 tow/hook + $50 "special equipment" (unexplained) + $25 "administrative fee" = $225, paid under protest 7/8/26. I was initially quoted $300 by phone. My written request for the company to identify what equipment was used and the code provision authorizing the admin and equipment charges is unanswered. 3. SIGNAGE (BMC 4.32.110): Lot signs state only a phone number — no company name, no retrieval location, and no schedule of towing/storage fees. Evidence available: invoice/receipt, payment confirmation, protest and request texts, the company's own tow photos, written statements from Granite Management, and parking payment records. Please investigate this company's compliance with Chapter 4.32 and contact me at 317 478 6542 [email protected].

Case Date:

7/8/2026

UPDATE 7/8/2026 — Vehicle recovered. New information for investigation: Tow company: Tow Time Solutions LLC, 1999 N Packing House Rd (Invoice #2305, Call #29202). 1. AUTHORIZATION (BMC 4.32.100(a)): Invoice shows tow requested 7/7/26 at 7:20 PM, completed 8:08 PM — after the management office closed. The invoice's "Authorized by" field reads "(PAV) Lincoln, 305," which is the property address, not a person. Granite's assistant leasing manager stated in writing that towing companies cannot access their parking portal and tow on their own initiative whenever no hanging tag is displayed — i.e., patrol towing with no per-tow written authorization. My 7/8 written request for a copy of the signed authorization is unanswered. My vehicle had been registered in Granite's parking system since 6/22/26 with parking paid. 2. FEES (BMC 4.32.130): Charged $150 tow/hook + $50 "special equipment" (unexplained) + $25 "administrative fee" = $225, paid under protest 7/8/26. I was initially quoted $300 by phone. My written request for the company to identify what equipment was used and the code provision authorizing the admin and equipment charges is unanswered. 3. SIGNAGE (BMC 4.32.110): Lot signs state only a phone number — no company name, no retrieval location, and no schedule of towing/storage fees. Evidence available: invoice/receipt, payment confirmation, protest and request texts, the company's own tow photos, written statements from Granite Management, and parking payment records. Please investigate this company's compliance with Chapter 4.32 and contact me at 317 478 6542 [email protected].

Case Date:

7/7/2026

On 7/7/2026 at approximately 5:00, my vehicle 2017 GMC Terrain, plate 714LG was towed by TowTime Towing at 523 N Lincoln St. I am a current resident who pays for parking at this complex. Management has my license plate, year, make, and model on file as an authorized vehicle; I had not yet been issued my physical parking badge. The tow occurred after the property management office had closed for the day. To my knowledge, no owner or authorized agent of the lot was present at the time of the tow to sign a contemporaneous written authorization for my specific vehicle, as required by BMC 4.32.100(a). The tow company is demanding $300 for release, which appears to exceed the fee limits in BMC 4.32.130. I request that the City investigate this company's compliance with Chapter 4.32, including its towing license, the written authorization for this tow, and the fees charged. I can provide photos and parking payment records. Please contact me at (317) 478-6542 [email protected]

Case Date:

6/21/2026

For blue bay health spa (Asian massage) is this place even licensed ? - was sore afterwards and hurting

Case Date:

6/21/2026

A young man has been traveling on sidewalk at a high speed on a one-wheel electric skateboard on East Moores Pike between Clifton Ave and Southeast park, eyes on phone or device as he skates and at times no helmet or protective gear. Medium/shoulder-length brown hair, goatee, shorts and t-shirt. We worry about the entrance of Sycamore Village, as he does not stop for traffic.

Case Date:

6/13/2026

Light art installation not working

Case Date:

6/10/2026

Two Bird scooters were abandond on the sidewalk in front of our house last week. My husband filed a report on August 8 and spoke to someone at HAND, who submitted the information, and it was assigned to Jeffrey Jackson. My husband left several messages to Jackson's office over a period of a couple of days to let him know the scooters were still there. Eventually, only one of the scooters was picked up even though they were parked next to each other. As I'm writing this, the scooter is still there. I am concerned because parking a scooter on a sidewalk is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. If nothing is done today, I will contact the Mayor's office with my concern.

Case Date:

6/10/2026

Two Bird scooters were abandond on the sidewalk in front of our house last week. My husband filed a report on August 8 and spoke to someone at HAND, who submitted the information, and it was assigned to Jeffrey Jackson. My husband left several messages to Jackson's office over a period of a couple of days to let him know the scooters were still there. Eventually, only one of the scooters was picked up even though they were parked next to each other. As I'm writing this, the scooter is still there. I am concerned because parking a scooter on a sidewalk is a violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. If nothing is done today, I will contact the Mayor's office with my concern.