closed #41182
Water Utility Billing Problems
425 S Grant ST
- Case Date:
- 4/21/2003
Ms. Knoy requested a reduction of sewer charges due to leak in building.
Ms. Knoy requested a reduction of sewer charges due to leak in building.
Mr. Clayton sent a letter to the PW Dept. that stated he received a letter from Insight Communucations regarding his channels and needing a converter box to get the package he already has that does not contain premium channels. He stated in the letter that his wife called Insight and ask if they had to have the box to keep getting the package that they currenty subscribe to that does not included premium channels, Insights stated that they would need the box. He would like this addressed.
Mr. Adams received large bill for former residence on 1221 N. Maple St. He wrote requesting info how this amount could be so large. Mr. Waller states that Cust. Serv. had wrong social security # on notice and that application could not be located. Would like an explanation.
Customer feels that his bill is excessive and requests that an adjustment be made. Piece on stool that holds handle to the bottom broke. Customer states that CBU employee could find no leaks and flipped a switch in toilet and stated that the problem was solved. Customer feels that CBU should have checked more closely.
Letter received from Harold G. Carter for McDoel Baptist Church. Customer claims that charges he received were not his and belonged to another customer.
Letter states that customer was not informed about a $54.00 charge, that water was not turned on as stated, and that Jennifer (Customer Relations rep.) was rude. States she will not pay $54.00 charge no matter what is done to her account.
Ms. McGlaun stated she was billed for tenant's delinquent payments after his moving from her property. Does not feel she should be liable since she was not notified promptly of delinquent bill.
Letter rec'd. from Charles Short stated that tenant at 2355 S. Zona St. left leaving delinquent account at CBU. Does not think he should be responsible for bill since he was not notified of tenant's delinquency.
customer feels $54 charge is unfair. She signed to have the service turned on in advance but utilities was unable to leave the water on. She called on a saturday to have the water turned on. She feels if she had been more informed about make sure all faucets needed to be off and the possibility of a problem this could have been avoided. The letter has been forwarded to Administration.
Customer requests adjustment on wastewater charge for filing swimming pool - would like the May reading not be used in determining amount of wastewater summer bills.