Case Date:

7/2/1998

Note: Address shown above is approx. (intersection of Pete Ellis and Longview). Mr. Van Orman called to ask if speed bumps could be installed on Pete Ellis Dr. There are several elderly people who live in this area and it is unsafe to be walking in this area because cars are travelling too fast on Pete Ellis Dr.. There is also a great potential for accidents at the intersection of Pete Ellis and Longview due to the speeds.

Case Date:

11/19/1997

Alley way behind 1021-1023 W. 12th Street (the cul-de-sac) is 1) almost out of gravel and 2) due to trees in right of way, is encroaching into complainants property. Mr. Onkst would like to see the alley repaired and realigned. Please call him with updates, etc

Case Date:

8/7/1998

There is currently "No Parking" on the south side of 11th Street from Monroe to Walnut Street. LeGrange has a difficult time pulling out of her drive when there are cars parked to the east of her drive. The neighbor has approx. 4-5 cars parked on the street up to her drive. She feels that the parking restriction should be on the north side of 11th Street from Monroe to Orris Drive. The line of sight is terrible on the north side. She would like the Traffic Commission to look into this matte

Case Date:

12/13/1995

Requesting a Stop Sign at the intersection of Russell and SR 45. (see letter in traffic complaint file.)

Case Date:

6/10/1997

SEE ATTACHED PETITION. THE REQUEST IS TO HAVE N. SUMMIT STREET CLOSED AT WEST 11TH STREET

Case Date:

3/5/1996

The Street marker sign installed by the developer at Franklin Business Park is too small. By MUTCD standards, it should be 8" instead of 5". Also, Stop signs and One-Way signage in accordance with MUTCD standards is required along Fairfield Drive.

Case Date:

3/5/1996

The Street marker sign installed by the developer at Franklin Business Park is too small. By MUTCD standards, it should be 8" instead of 5". Also, Stop signs and One-Way signage in accordance with MUTCD standards is required along Fairfield Drive.

Case Date:

3/12/1996

Complainant is requesting a "loading Zone" at the above address. (see letter in traffic complaint file)

Case Date:

5/9/2000

This complaint is in lieu of a letter that Mr. Brostoff was to submit to the Traffic Commission requesting that the existing loading zone sign in front of 1200 N. College be removed and the parking revert back to 2 hour. Brostoff moved his business to this address within the last few months. There was an existing loading zone sign in front of his business. He does not need this loading zone and would like to have the parking space for customers.

Case Date:

3/12/1996

Complainant is requesting a "loading Zone" at the above address. (see letter in traffic complaint file)