Case Date:

9/4/2002

customer called about the fire protection charge on a hydrant meter he has rented. He says he was only quoted the min. water service charge of 30.87 and not the additional 17.45 for the fire protection. I explained to him that the fire protection is a meter base charge for every meter. He still feels he shouldn't have to pay it since he says that amount was not quoted to him. He wanted someone with higher authority than myself to contact him.

Case Date:

9/17/2002

Mr. LaGrange sent letter explaining that IMI did not receive ww charge until 5/02 in the amount of $2,272.77. They paid this amount but have now received other ww bills and are asking for adjustment.

Case Date:

10/7/2002

Cust very unhappy with the fact that we don't make an adj for watering (if not single-family residental). They had done some work and did alot of watering outside. They more than doubled their normal usage.

Case Date:

11/26/2002

Cust is unhappy with having to pay the service charges for her irrigation meter over the winter months while not in use. Also, expressed that increase in irrigation water charges is excessive.

Case Date:

12/9/2002

Customer unhappy with having to pay service charges over winter while in Florida

Case Date:

12/9/2002

Customer unhappy with having to pay services charges for winter while in Florida.

Case Date:

1/9/2003

Mr. Freeman called to say his bill has been messed up for several months. He says he paid bill last month, but bill received this month does not have matter cleared up. Paula Dodds knows about the problem. Does not want matter taken to USB Subcommittee. Wants matter cleared up by CBU Director. Problem is bill for temp. hydrant meter.

Case Date:

2/27/2003

Sara sent a letter via fax stating the following: November 2002 Sara spoke w/ Mr. Phillips and Paula Dodds regarding the billing situation for acct #67625. She was faxed a statement saying they owed $100.14 and this would bring them current. Since that point their bills are still showing a balance forward. She has contacted CBU on numberous occasions as to where this bal is from w/ no succcess. She feels that CBU has lost their interest in satisfying their customers.

Case Date:

4/14/2003

Mr. Wright feels that a large bill he received was fault of his water meter. Meter was checked & found to be working properly. Mr. Wright wants to take this matter to USB for review.

Case Date:

4/21/2003

Mr. Thompson called because he did not want to make unpaid sewer payments for his tenants at 724 W. Dixie and 2504 S. Rogers who did not pay bills.