closed #58323
Other
1109 W 8th ST
- Case Date:
- 4/29/1999
Ms. Cherrington has problem with $1500 occupancy fine. In addition, she feels that the City provides no way to appeal such fines. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER FOR MORE DETAILS.
Ms. Cherrington has problem with $1500 occupancy fine. In addition, she feels that the City provides no way to appeal such fines. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER FOR MORE DETAILS.
SEE ATTACHED LETTER.
PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER AND PHOTOGRAPHS.
Would like to see a proposed walk added to Southeast Park. Increase mowing schedule of park.
Ms. Shapiro wrote to thank the Department for closing the Stull St. parking lot this winter. She indicated that when the lot is open, loud noise creates problems for her.
Catherine did not pay the "unregistered fee" for $105.00 at this time because she doesn't understand how it could be applicable to her, and has requested that someone explain it to her. She states that neither her nor her husband received any notification that they had to register with the COB, until HAND notified them this summer, stating that you had to register to rent. SEE ATTACHED LETTER. (AK)
Comment/suggestion re: People's Park. Saw article in the HT about improvements. Would like to add a suggestion that the wall be removed. It attracts people to sit on it and attracts walkers-by to converse w/those sitting on it and blocks pedestrian traffic on sidewalk. In addition, it is dingy and unattractive. She applauds the Dept for its initiative to improve the park.
Ms. Anton wrote the Council concerned about flyers being placed on her door. She was worried that if they were placed while she was away burlars would know that no one was home. She wanted to know whether we had or would consider an ordinance prohibiting the use of flyers. Do we have any regulations regarding the use of door hanger notices?
Phyllis & Samuel Guskin wrote re. 1725 E. Hunter Ave. They want to object to a request to subdivide existing single family residential lot at 1900 Atwater. They feel that the land is unsuitable for development because it appears to be a sinkhole. They also feel that the water retention needs should be addressed before any development is permitted. Letter was received by Util. Dept. but referred to COB Planning Dept.
TCC Council Member states that has several issues with Insight. See attached documents for details.