closed #173712
Sidewalk & Curb Complaints
1200 S Fenbrook Ln, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
- Case Date:
- 9/14/2020
Plants are encroaching on sidewalk, making it difficult to pass.
Plants are encroaching on sidewalk, making it difficult to pass.
Case 173643 address: 3522 E. Morningside Drive I see the case is marked as "Closed, Resolved". Wrong - still a mess and now the front door is wide open. Neighbors very concerned about homeless entered. Action please. Nothing has occurred since my report last week. Please contact the owner to clean it up.
nets are gone from lower Sherwood Oaks Tennis court
How much at the restaurants paying to use the public parking/roadways? These restaurants take up an entire road and the parking spaces on both sides of the road.
You asked my husband Ronald to do a 5-year Master Plan Community Survey and he passed in April 2018. And I am not interested in ding the Survey. Thanks
Hi there! First off, Switchyard Park is looking really good. I know finishing touches are still in process. I was excited to see that the dog parks are now open. However, several times now we've taken our small dog (below 25 pounds) to the small dog park only to see that number of people have their large dogs in the enclosure. It wasn't possible to use the park because the dogs were rather rough during play with the other dogs. The first time we thought maybe it was a fluke but the subsequent two times the same thing happened. The small sign on the placard isn't particularly visible so I'm wondering if it would be possible to have a sign directly on the entry gate labelled "small dogs" and a "large dog" sign on the opposite dog park gate? Perhaps you could also indicate either the weight maximum or example of standard dog breeds considered small v. large. I've seen such signs in other municipalities for their small v. large dog parks. Thank you!! Keep up the great work.
sign: 'Collins Tree Services' in the grass next to College Mall Road in front of the matress store/ CVS. I forgot if you told me (see #173124) if this is on private property. If so, I will not mention it anymore.
Excessive growth, as always.
I wasn't sure where to send this to but hoping you can share these remarks with the Historic Preservation Commission: The HPC seems to have developed a recent tendency to focus not on the history of buildings and places but instead on what is going to be built in making decisions. I would like them to emphasize the former more, as believe it more closely aligns with their expertise and jurisdiction. Commissioner Derek Richey for instance posted to the History Club Facebook page about the Player's Pub building. Totally fine, but he also posted that implied scary, ugly, and expensive student housing would be built there. Let Planners and the City Commission deal with that. I'd like HPC to focus on whether something is worth saving, and if the only reason it is worth saving is to stop something HPC doesn't like instead of its historic value, that is not a good reason for HPC to stop something. I have no dog in the fight with this building - whatever happens is fine - but let's not use scare tactics and pseudoplanning. Historic districts are often pitched to neighborhoods as a means to enhance property values so complaining about how something high priced will go in somewhere is a bit hypocritical anyways. Also thank you for those times you all allow flexibility to creative development and reuse when keeping the old while adding new needed dimensions to our town.
Car parked in street for several days, impeding traffic