Case Date:

9/1/2026

I would like to suggest adding a designated pedestrian crossing at this location. This area is frequently used by students and other pedestrians traveling to and from the IU campus. There are also churches, mosques, and residential areas nearby, which contribute to regular pedestrian activity. Crossing the street at this location can be difficult and unsafe because 3rd Street carries heavy traffic. The situation becomes especially challenging because vehicles coming from S. Rose Avenue are also merging into or crossing the traffic on 3rd Street. With pedestrians trying to cross at the same location, there are several movements happening at once, which can create a potentially dangerous situation. A clearly designated pedestrian crossing, along with appropriate signs, signals, or other pedestrian safety measures, would make this area much safer and more accessible. Given the proximity to the university, residential neighborhoods, and places of worship, I believe improving pedestrian access at this location would benefit both students and the surrounding community.

Case Date:

8/30/2026

The intersection of wood lawn and Hillside is dangerous. We live two doors away and here car accidents all the time. I was once T-bone on my bike by someone coping out of Wood law. We desperately need a stop sign or traffic like there.

Case Date:

8/30/2026

Hey—-whatever happened to making Covenator a better bike route for east-west travel with a safer collegeMall rd crossing. At least bike lanes! Its been years of anticipation!

Case Date:

8/30/2026

The live east bound travel lane is undermined. Several feet of open inadequately protected trench. Not enough room to list everything in this format.

Case Date:

8/30/2026

Vehicles can’t get through when the IU students park on both sides of the street. Maybe signage is needed?

Case Date:

8/29/2026

Parking is allowed on the east side of the road, which makes it impossible for two vehicles to pass since parking is also allowed on west side of road. Unsafe near collision observed this morning. Should change to only allow parking on one side.

Case Date:

8/28/2026

You currently have 2 police cruisers hiding at the intersection of E Allendale and S Westminster pulling people over for rolling through the stop signs on E. Allendale. The reason everyone rolls through those stop signs is because it's a stupid place to have a stop sign. It's widely understood in traffic engineering that when the majority of drivers disregard a speed limit or traffic device, the speed limit or traffic device is the problem. I'm requesting a traffic study to determine whether stop signs are appropriate on E Allendale and consistent with the MUTCD. There should be a stop sign for traffic approaching Allendale from S. Westminster, but there should be no stop signs on E. Allendale. I am certain a traffic study would bear this out and we could quit wasting police officer's time pulling drivers over for committing traffic "infractions" that are entirely safe. The MUTCD explicitly states "YIELD or STOP signs shall not be used for speed control" (MUTCD 2B.06 para 06) MUTCD Section 2B.11 states: Minor Road Stop Control Guidance: 01 Stop control on the minor-road approach or approaches to an intersection should be considered when engineering judgment indicates that one or more of the following conditions exist: A. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway. B. Crash records indicate that: 1. For a four-leg intersection, there are three or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or six or more reported crashes in a 36-month period. The crashes should be susceptible to correction by installation of minor-road stop control. 2. For a three-leg intersection, there are three or more reported crashes in a 12-month period or five or more reported crashes in a 36-month period. The crashes should be susceptible to correction by installation of minor-road stop control. C. The intersection is of a lower functional classification road with a higher functional classification road. D. Conditions that previously supported the installation of all-way stop control no longer exist. See also MUTCD sSection 2B.12 All-Way Stop Control: The decision to establish all-way stop control at an unsignalized intersection should be based on an engineering study. The engineering study for all-way stop control should include an analysis of factors related to the existing operation and safety at the intersection, the potential to improve these conditions, and the applicable factors contained in the following all-way stop control warrants: A. All-Way Stop Control Warrant A: Crash Experience (see Section 2B.13) B. All-Way Stop Control Warrant B: Sight Distance (see Section 2B.14) C. All-Way Stop Control Warrant C: Transition to Signal Control or Transition to Yield Control at a Circular Intersection (see Section 2B.15) D. All-Way Stop Control Warrant D: 8-Hour Volume (Vehicles, Pedestrians, Bicycles) (see Section 2B.16) E. All-Way Stop Control Warrant E: Other Factors (see Section 2B.17) https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/11th_Edition/mutcd11thedition.pdf "Stop compliance is poor at unwarranted multi-way STOP signs. An unwarranted STOP is defined as a STOP sign which does not meet the warrants of the MUTCD. Drivers do not stop because they feel that the signs have no traffic control purpose. Drivers believe there is little reason to yield the right-of-way when there are usually no vehicles on the minor street. " GUIDELINES FOR REMOVAL OF TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES IN RURAL AREAS, Iowa State University (available at: https://publications.iowa.gov/3629/1/signs_removal.pdf) " situations having high violation rates include ignoring speed limit signs, disregarding STOP signs, and not stopping before turning right at red traffic signals. However, the limited data taken over the years did not indicate the violation rates were increasing. Driver interview studies found motorists often violate control devices when they determined "no risk" is involved. It is concluded that traffic control devices should be installed only where they are reasonable, and they should not unduly restrict the motorist. If high violation rates are observed, it is an indication the control device is not being properly applied by the traffic engineer or there is a lack of driver understanding. Heavy enforcement is not usually a practical solution." Motorist Compliance With Standard Traffic Control Devices Publication No. FHWA-RD-89-103 (available at https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/25685/dot_25685_DS1.pdf)

Case Date:

8/28/2026

The traffic light at South Dr and Walnut keeps turning red for Walnut with no crossing pedestrians or cars.

Case Date:

8/27/2026

On the sidewalk along the north side of Weatherstone, there is a branch with a sharp edge at approximately eye level.

Case Date:

8/27/2026

Horrific parking that puts eastbound traffic into oncoming traffic at stop sign! Landlord didn’t supply proper parking in our residential neighborhood,again!