uReport

City of Bloomington, Indiana

Search

Fields to display

Search Results: (258)

closed #58323

Other

1109 W 8th ST

Case Date:
4/29/1999

Ms. Cherrington has problem with $1500 occupancy fine. In addition, she feels that the City provides no way to appeal such fines. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER FOR MORE DETAILS.

closed #58739

Other

1106 S WALNUT ST

Case Date:
3/22/1999

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER AND PHOTOGRAPHS.

closed #39814

Water Utility Billing Problems

1104 E Azalea LN

Case Date:
8/25/2003

Owner wrote re. property at 1104 E. Azalea Lane in Bloomington. Tenant moved leaving large, unpaid bill. Owner does not feel she should be held responsible for bill and request review by USB Subcommittee.

closed #41837

City Construction Projects

1103 N Woodburn AVE

Case Date:
1/22/2003

Letter stated Mr. Schatz feels that a crack (leak) in his pvc pipe connector to meter was caused by damage during construction. Customer had break repaired but received extra large water bill. Wants matter investigated and adjustment made.

closed #39914

Trash

110 S Smith RD

Case Date:
8/14/2003

Portable carport in the driveway. Many times a month the sidewalk is blocked by vehicles.

closed #100085

Water Utility Billing Problems

1026 E 1st ST

Case Date:
8/16/2004

Customer had new stool installed but had to leave in a hurry. Apparently, stool did not shut off. Customer wants adjustment made on water bill.

closed #82282

Excessive Growth

1019 E Miller DR

Case Date:
7/13/2009

Overgrowth

closed #11548

Excessive Growth

1019 E Maxwell LN

Case Date:
7/7/2009

High grass and weeds

closed #101494

Sidewalk Snow Removal

1010 S Jordan AVE

Case Date:
3/29/2004

Letter rec'd. at CBU concerns storm sewer system along Ruby Lane to Mitchell and Southdowns Avenues. Mr. Rayfield is concerned about the drain connection. Since this project is a Public Works project, this letter was referred to DPW.

closed #103438

Other

1005 E Sassafras CIR

Case Date:
4/24/2003

Mr. Clayton sent a letter to the PW Dept. that stated he received a letter from Insight Communucations regarding his channels and needing a converter box to get the package he already has that does not contain premium channels. He stated in the letter that his wife called Insight and ask if they had to have the box to keep getting the package that they currenty subscribe to that does not included premium channels, Insights stated that they would need the box. He would like this addressed.