Water Utility Billing Problems
2355 S Zona CT
- Case Date:
- 6/2/2003
Letter rec'd. from Charles Short stated that tenant at 2355 S. Zona St. left leaving delinquent account at CBU. Does not think he should be responsible for bill since he was not notified of tenant's delinquency.
Water Utility Billing Problems
3247 S Walnut Springs DR
- Case Date:
- 6/2/2003
customer feels $54 charge is unfair. She signed to have the service turned on in advance but utilities was unable to leave the water on. She called on a saturday to have the water turned on. She feels if she had been more informed about make sure all faucets needed to be off and the possibility of a problem this could have been avoided. The letter has been forwarded to Administration.
Water Utility Billing Problems
3362 N Valleyview DR
- Case Date:
- 6/13/2003
Customer requests adjustment on wastewater charge for filing swimming pool - would like the May reading not be used in determining amount of wastewater summer bills.
Water Utility Billing Problems
1417 S Monon DR
- Case Date:
- 6/17/2003
Letter received from James A. Swinson stated that he received certified letter re. a delinquent account for his former tenant (Tyler Collier) for property at 1417 S. Monon. Mr. Swinson does not think he should be responsible for former tenant's account since he was not notified in a timely fashion.
Water Utility Billing Problems
3341 N Kinser PIKE
- Case Date:
- 6/17/2003
Ms. Warren requested an adjustment on account for property she owns at 3341 N. Kinser Pike. Her tenant left owing 7 months utilities bills. She does not feel she should be held responsible for her tenant's unpaid bills.
Water Utility Billing Problems
1355 N Lincoln ST
- Case Date:
- 6/26/2003
Olympus prop. received large bill ($394.52) for former tenant (C. Stone Chadwick) at 1355 N. Lincoln. They do not feel they should be held responsible for former tenant's bill when they were not notified of delinquent account.
Water Utility Billing Problems
4154 E Hector DR
- Case Date:
- 7/21/2003
Customer is very upset about the fact of having to pay a higher rate for their irrigation water vs their house water. Also, they were surprised about the $18 fee to have the meter s/o in the fall because we used to not charge a "disconnect" fee only a "reconnect" fee in the Spring. I explained to her the policy had changed, and to avoid paying the service fees over the Winter she would have the $18 s/o in the Fall and the $18 turn on in the Spring. I let her know each trip was a svc call.
Water Utility Billing Problems
415 N Roosevelt ST
- Case Date:
- 7/21/2003
Customer feels he was "ripped off" because we charged him an $18 service fee to shut off his meter when he ended his service. He feels after being a customer and paying for our services for some time that we should not charge them to stop their service.
Water Utility Billing Problems
210 N Smith RD
- Case Date:
- 7/22/2003
Owner, Robert Crider, wants to protest his being held responsible for large unpaid bill for tenant Amanda Choi. He states he did not receive notification of delinquent bill.
Water Utility Billing Problems
3412 N Windcrest DR
- Case Date:
- 7/24/2003
Sara Feuerbach, owner of 3411 Windcrest, does not feel she should be responsible for unpaid bill of former tenant (Victoria Johnson) because she was not timely notified of delinquency. Ms. Feuerbach requests review by the USB Administrative Subcommittee.