- Case Date:
- 10/13/2018
Hello - I am reporting a noise violation that I have previously reported to the City. I do not want to burden the police department with this, as I believe it can be worked out in a reasonable manner.
The Royal Toyota South car lot on Walnut is a noise violation according to City Ordinances.
I first reported this problem in December 2017 (Ureport Case #162088). The case is marked as "resolved" although the phone continues to ring just as loud and just as frequently to this day.
Since that time, I have determined the City simply does not care. Business with multiple locations and money in town, versus lowly homeowner. I decided to report it again today because the phone has been ringing quite a bit lately.
A review of City Ordinance 14.09.040 does not show this as a valid exemption. Under 14.09.030(c)(4) a loudspeaker is a prohibited noise. Also, I have heard this phone ring between the hours of 9pm and 7am previously which "is prima facie evidence of a violation of this section."
The car lot has previously acknowledged to the City that this is their phone ringing.
I simply want to be afforded the quiet enjoyment of my home and my property free from this incessant noise violation. I am roughly 2,000 feet from this car lot. I also know this is heard on the golf course at the Country Club, more than 3,000 feet from the car lot.
The City is allowing one perpetrator to cast a very wide net of annoyance to local residents through a repeated noise violation. Please help those of us on the south side by putting an end to this violation of City ordinances. Thank you.
Best,
Nick
- Case Date:
- 1/4/2022
Testing whether the issue with Ureport on phones is fixed
- Case Date:
- 3/9/2023
Hello, while at the local skating rink I noticed extension cords after extension cords plugged together. And it looks like a fire Hazzard and when I was in the place it was packed with kids. I think the fire marshal should have an extensive look before tragedy strikes
- Case Date:
- 8/24/2023
This school kicked me out because basically there was rumours or "ConCeRns" that I was gay. They kicked me out or didnt let me back in because I never said they were false. They also didnt do CRAP about the bullying situations me and my friends were in. Me and my friends would get in trouble for the most stupid reasons as well. There was an assembly where the lesson was about a woman washing jesus's feet. Me and my friends started laughing because the principle was washing peoples feet for real. Then this science teacher took us into her room which had students inside and made us take our shoes and socks off. Then she basically forced us to let her wash and rub our feet in mop buckets. I deff heard snickering in the back ground but I know damn well they didnt do crap about that.
- Case Date:
- 9/13/2022
The restaurant had perishable food items such as green onions, garlic and cilantro sitting out without refrigeration for long periods of time. Bathrooms were not cleaned regularly.
Business
337 E Winslow Rd, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
- Case Date:
- 9/14/2022
On Saturday September 10th my boyfriend (Bryan Castillo) took my dog Willie to get a bath and groom at House of Paws (aka Pawsitive Grooming, Daisy's Darling Dogs) with Shena as scheduled the day before. At 3:26 pm I received a call that there was an incident with my dog. I was told that she had a small cut that was not bleeding and if they should just hold my dog down and keep grooming or I can come in and hold her down to finish. After the call Bryan Castillo and I went over there to get our dog. When we arrived the groomer brought Willie out, when we saw the cut we were in shock. There was a 2-3 inch laceration between Willie's stomach and leg. The staff was blaming Willie for the incident. The groomers were negligent in handling Willie. We had to drive an 72 miles to the nearest urgent vet at 14069 Mundy Dr, Fischer, Indiana. Our dog received several stables to close the wound.
- Case Date:
- 9/12/2022
I am contacting you as well as other government officials for your assistance in correcting the unscrupulous business practices of AuthorHouse. I have evidence of this claim and have tried to make resolution to no avail. I need your assistance in making AuthorHouse accountable to stealing from me as an author and return of money from services that have not been rendered because AuthorHouse can not be trusted. I can also be contacted by phone at (301)704-1162. Thank you.
- Case Date:
- 10/4/2022
Please provide the city inspection report for the VERVE apartments Bloomington, 1820 North Walnut Street
Business
113 E Kirkwood AVE
- Case Date:
- 10/25/2022
After reading about the variance denied to the property owner, Randy Lloyd, I couldn’t help but think about the current use of the site at or about 113 E Kirkwood. This property sits in an overlay that does not permit surface parking. I can’t find any use in the UDO where parking is allowed when not attached to a structure, and I specifically remember a number of discussions regarding this issue. In particular the Methodist Church’s desire to convert the footprint of the old post office to surface parking. I believe that had to turn it into green space. I also have concerns that this lot is 100% impervious. 20.4.20 I just don’t see how this use satisfies the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan, the existing UDO, or is consistent w previous use determinations. Further, the owner expanded the parking from what was there pre-demolition of the 4th street garage without any public review. Finally, I doubt this parcel meets the requirements of 18.12.10. How would BFD access or service a car fire on this parcel? It’s too narrow to get truck in there and difficult to service from the alley. This use may have been over looked during the demolition and reconstruction of the 4th street garage, even though parking was not really needed downtown during the pandemic, however, it’s time for enforcement against this parcel and other nonconforming uses.
- Case Date:
- 11/23/2022
I reside at Cambridge Square Apartments bldg303 Apartment 313. The manager Diane Cook repeatedly violates the lease with myself and several owner residents current and former. She is required to give 48 hours notice before entering. She does not and or enters 2 days after in some instances!