Case Date:

11/7/1997

LETTER WAS REC'D. FROM MS. THRASHER REQUESTING THAT CBU ALLOW MORE MONTHS DURING WHICH CREDIT IS ALLOWED FOR WATERING LAWNS.

Case Date:

10/15/1997

"Discount Blinds & Verticals" sign illegally posted.

Case Date:

10/15/1997

"Decks & More" sign posted in violation of code on south side of E. 3rd St. between Pleasant Ridge and Reisner.

Case Date:

9/12/1997

Comment/suggestion re: People's Park. Saw article in the HT about improvements. Would like to add a suggestion that the wall be removed. It attracts people to sit on it and attracts walkers-by to converse w/those sitting on it and blocks pedestrian traffic on sidewalk. In addition, it is dingy and unattractive. She applauds the Dept for its initiative to improve the park.

Case Date:

9/2/1997

MR. MILLMAN WROTE LETTER STATING THAT HE DID NOT RECEIVE SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK UNTIL AFTER THE 1ST OF EACH MONTH. HIS UTILITY BILL IS DUE ON THE 26TH. HE REQUESTED THAT HIS DUE DATE BE CHANGED BECAUSE IT IS NECESSARY THAT HE PAY DELINQUENT FEES EACH MONTH.

Case Date:

8/15/1997

Traffic calming device at 6th and Rogers inappropriate. See letter. xc: Julio Alonso

Case Date:

8/7/1997

Ms. Anton wrote the Council concerned about flyers being placed on her door. She was worried that if they were placed while she was away burlars would know that no one was home. She wanted to know whether we had or would consider an ordinance prohibiting the use of flyers. Do we have any regulations regarding the use of door hanger notices?

Case Date:

7/1/1997

"Business Office Space Available" sign illegally posted

Case Date:

6/16/1997

Three or four inch drop off from Hinkle Road onto Headley Road due to recent paving. Have been numerous traffic accidents. See attached letter.

Case Date:

3/11/1997

LETTER WAS RECEIVED ON 3/11/97 FROM MARY C. FARQUHAR OF THE BLOOMINGTON THRIFT SHOP. MS. FARQUHAR STATED THEY RECEIVED A LARGE BILL. SHE STATED THAT ON 2/11/97 A REP FROM CBU WENT TO THE THRIFT SHOP AND TOLD THEM THEY USED 60,000 GALLONS DURING THE PREVIOUS PERIOD AND SUGGESTED THAT THEY HAD A LEAK. THEY CALLED A PLUMBER AND HAD THE LEAK REPAIRED. THEY ARE REQUESTING THAT THE PORTION OF THEIR BILL OVER NORMAL USAGE BE CANCELED SINCE THERE WAS A LEAK.