closed #212684
Biking & Walking
1307 W 3rd ST
- Case Date:
- 7/28/2026
Road closed sign blocking the bike lane
Road closed sign blocking the bike lane
Not clear which house is responsible (713 or 711), but the bush honeysuckle on the property line has grown out all the way over the sidewalk alongside Lincoln.
Weeds are blocking the view at the intersection of Weimer and Tapp by the bridge. This is a busy street so the weeds need cutting.
It appears the light is now changing to green for southbound vehicles at Bryan/High even if there's no one sitting there. It used to only turn green if someone was waiting or had tripped the sensors. This is causing backup traffic along 3rd Street and delaying northbound High Street traffic from turning.
This light is on a timer, rather than sensors, so people just sit waiting even when there's no traffic coming from other directions. It's especially annoying when the left turn arrows engage when no one is there. I've reported this light for about 2 years now. Very inconvenient and frustrating to sit and sit when no traffic is coming from other directions.
Road close traffic signs/barrier blocking the bike lane abruptly in a high speed road. Almost got hit by a car when I had to go around the signs left there by construction crew.
Recently drove Weimer south to Tapp and turned left/east onto Tapp. The foliage is pretty tall right near that corner along the north side of Tapp, making it a little hard to see the fast-moving traffic coming west on downhill Tapp and also turning west from Kegg Rd. I don't know if the roadside growth is Woolery Mill's responsibility so thought I'd start with the city.
Pretty sure this light used to be on a sensor and now it seems to be on a timer. The past else real Sundays I've driven through some time between 10:15am and 1:30pm the east-west has turned red with zero cars in the north or south sides of the intersection. And no vehicles have triggered it but then turned right onto Tapp. With much less traffic on Sundays it'd be great to have it (back?) on a sensor.
The light was (for the last 20 years or so) using sensors in the pavement to trigger the light and only worked when traffic needed it. Now, it is only timed and not dependent on traffic, so Walnut backs up both ways for no reason- not a car in sight from the school or the old Kia dealership.
ATT came onto my property to install fiber via a utility easement with the city and left my yard damaged per attached photo. ATT said they are not liable for the damage. The installers had stated they would return the following day to level the ground, seed and straw the area. That was over a month ago and they never returned. Who is liable for this property damage? I am prepared to file a claim against whomever that may be. Thanks.