Mr. Williams owns property at 611 N. Monroe that was occupied by Sally L. Vest. There was a large bill due when Ms. Vest moved. Mr. Williams is disputing the fact that he was not notified by CBU about the large bill. He did receive letter re. a lien being recorded on the property.
Mr. Wright feels that a large bill he received was fault of his water meter. Meter was checked & found to be working properly. Mr. Wright wants to take this matter to USB for review.
Mr. Adams received large bill for former residence on 1221 N. Maple St. He wrote requesting info how this amount could be so large. Mr. Waller states that Cust. Serv. had wrong social security # on notice and that application could not be located. Would like an explanation.
Mr. Blessing called and stated that he owns a piece of property that contains 4 houses. He has disputes with the utility bills for these 4 houses and has talked to Steve Saulter. Mr. Blessing wants to take his complaint to the USB Admin. Subcommittee.
Customer feels that his bill is excessive and requests that an adjustment be made. Piece on stool that holds handle to the bottom broke. Customer states that CBU employee could find no leaks and flipped a switch in toilet and stated that the problem was solved. Customer feels that CBU should have checked more closely.
Customer requests adjustment on wastewater charge for filing swimming pool - would like the May reading not be used in determining amount of wastewater summer bills.
Ms. Warren requested an adjustment on account for property she owns at 3341 N. Kinser Pike. Her tenant left owing 7 months utilities bills. She does not feel she should be held responsible for her tenant's unpaid bills.
Olympus prop. received large bill ($394.52) for former tenant (C. Stone Chadwick) at 1355 N. Lincoln. They do not feel they should be held responsible for former tenant's bill when they were not notified of delinquent account.
Customer is very upset about the fact of having to pay a higher rate for their irrigation water vs their house water. Also, they were surprised about the $18 fee to have the meter s/o in the fall because we used to not charge a "disconnect" fee only a "reconnect" fee in the Spring. I explained to her the policy had changed, and to avoid paying the service fees over the Winter she would have the $18 s/o in the Fall and the $18 turn on in the Spring. I let her know each trip was a svc call.
Customer feels he was "ripped off" because we charged him an $18 service fee to shut off his meter when he ended his service. He feels after being a customer and paying for our services for some time that we should not charge them to stop their service.