customer feels $54 charge is unfair. She signed to have the service turned on in advance but utilities was unable to leave the water on. She called on a saturday to have the water turned on. She feels if she had been more informed about make sure all faucets needed to be off and the possibility of a problem this could have been avoided. The letter has been forwarded to Administration.
Letter states that customer was not informed about a $54.00 charge, that water was not turned on as stated, and that Jennifer (Customer Relations rep.) was rude. States she will not pay $54.00 charge no matter what is done to her account.
Customer requests adjustment on wastewater charge for filing swimming pool - would like the May reading not be used in determining amount of wastewater summer bills.
Letter received from James A. Swinson stated that he received certified letter re. a delinquent account for his former tenant (Tyler Collier) for property at 1417 S. Monon. Mr. Swinson does not think he should be responsible for former tenant's account since he was not notified in a timely fashion.
Ms. Warren requested an adjustment on account for property she owns at 3341 N. Kinser Pike. Her tenant left owing 7 months utilities bills. She does not feel she should be held responsible for her tenant's unpaid bills.
Olympus prop. received large bill ($394.52) for former tenant (C. Stone Chadwick) at 1355 N. Lincoln. They do not feel they should be held responsible for former tenant's bill when they were not notified of delinquent account.
Customer is very upset about the fact of having to pay a higher rate for their irrigation water vs their house water. Also, they were surprised about the $18 fee to have the meter s/o in the fall because we used to not charge a "disconnect" fee only a "reconnect" fee in the Spring. I explained to her the policy had changed, and to avoid paying the service fees over the Winter she would have the $18 s/o in the Fall and the $18 turn on in the Spring. I let her know each trip was a svc call.
Customer feels he was "ripped off" because we charged him an $18 service fee to shut off his meter when he ended his service. He feels after being a customer and paying for our services for some time that we should not charge them to stop their service.
Owner, Robert Crider, wants to protest his being held responsible for large unpaid bill for tenant Amanda Choi. He states he did not receive notification of delinquent bill.
Sara Feuerbach, owner of 3411 Windcrest, does not feel she should be responsible for unpaid bill of former tenant (Victoria Johnson) because she was not timely notified of delinquency. Ms. Feuerbach requests review by the USB Administrative Subcommittee.